Logical Equivalences, Homomorphism Indistinguishability, and Forbidden Minors

lax-871432·formalized by Tim Seppelt @tseppelt·registered·created ·GitHub @1ec6490·Lean v4.33.0 epoch · mathlib db584cd6d46c

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this submission may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this submission

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    Abstract

    Two graphs GG and HH are homomorphism indistinguishable over a class of graphs F\mathcal{F} if hom(F,G)=hom(F,H)\hom(F, G) = \hom(F, H) for every FFF \in \mathcal{F}. Many equivalence relations comparing graphs such as (quantum) isomorphism, spectral equivalences, equivalences with respect to counting logic fragments can be characterised as homomorphism indistinguishability relations over natural graph classes.

    This submission formalises the correspondence between closure properties of a graph class F\mathcal{F} and preservation properties of its homomorphism indistinguishability relation F\equiv_{\mathcal{F}}. Its main results are that F\equiv_{\mathcal{F}} is preserved under taking complements if and only if cl(F)\mathrm{cl}(\mathcal{F}) is minor-closed. Both rest on a lemma of Curticapean, Dell and Marx turning a linear combination of homomorphism counts determined by F\equiv_{\mathcal{F}} into membership in cl(F)\mathrm{cl}(\mathcal{F}), which in turn rests on Lovász's theorem that homomorphism counts determine a finite graph up to isomorphism.

    The submission also formalises Roberson's conjecture (minor-closed union-closed graph classes are homomorphism distinguishing closed) and many basic notions from homomorphism indistinguishability including Lovász's theorem (homomorphism indistinguishability over all graphs is isomorphism) and the invertibility of the matrix (hom(F,G))F,G(\hom(F, G))_{F, G}.

    View annotated paper

    25 pages · 35 marked passages

    Concepts

    Concept map
    30 concepts
    100%
    Proven claimOpen claimDefinitionThis submissionOther submissionA → B: B builds on A

    Proofs

    Proof networkview on GitHub

    100%
    assumptions conclusionProven claimOpen claimStatement 1, 2, … of a claim with several statementsClaim from this submissionProof — open large view for details
    Proof list

    Lean sources for these proofs: proofs/ on GitHub

    Proof code is not displayed; the archive records each proof's checked relationship between claims.

    Related submissions

    Submission map

    100%
    This submissionOther submissionA → B: B's concepts build on A

    Cite this

    This is only the formalizers. The authors of the formalized results may be different (see References).

    @misc{lax-871432,
      author = {Tim Seppelt},
      title = {Logical Equivalences, Homomorphism Indistinguishability, and Forbidden Minors},
      year = {2026},
      howpublished = {Lax Archive, lax-871432},
      url = {https://laxarchive.org/lax-871432/},
    }

    References

    1. Tim Seppelt. Logical equivalences, homomorphism indistinguishability, and forbidden minors. Information and Computation 301:105224, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ic.2024.105224
    2. David E. Roberson. Oddomorphisms and homomorphism indistinguishability over graphs of bounded degree. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 181:1–61, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jctb.2026.07.003 · linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0095895626000432
    3. László Lovász. Operations with structures. Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 18:321–328, 1967. doi:10.1007/BF02280291
    4. Radu Curticapean, Holger Dell and Dániel Marx. Homomorphisms are a good basis for counting small subgraphs. Proceedings of the 49th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing 210–223, 2017. doi:10.1145/3055399.3055502
    5. László Lovász. Large networks and graph limits. American Mathematical Society volume 60, 2012. doi:10.1090/coll/060

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…