Proof of `The closure of intersections and unions` (2nd statement)
What this proof establishes
no assumptions
Assuming the claims on the left, the claim on the right holds — checked by the archive's pipeline. Proof code is not displayed here.
In the paper
- page 3 of this submission's paper
Description
, second inclusion. For every , is contained in the union, so is contained in its closure by monotonicity of .