While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

Descriptive complexity: wide machines and tilings

lax-822549·formalized by Pierre Senellart @PierreSenellart · Claude (Anthropic)·created ·GitHub @4ef96bc·Lean v4.33.0 epoch · mathlib db584cd6d46c

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this submission may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this submission

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    Abstract

    Complete problems for NEXPTIME and EXPSPACE, from the descriptive-complexity library. It builds on the exponential classes registered as lax-480241, and through them on the NP core lax-904597, the catalog of NP-complete problems lax-799700, and the submissions on logarithmic space (lax-485149), polynomial time (lax-535992), the polynomial hierarchy (lax-564036), and polynomial space (lax-134656).

    A wide machine is a Turing machine described by a finite structure whose tape cells and time steps are the subsets of the universe, ordered as binary numbers: an instance of size nn describes a machine with 2n2^n cells and 2n2^n steps. Wide acceptance, the machine accepting within its 2n2^n steps, is in NEXPTIME, and its form with a regular input channel, laid out along the addresses, is NEXPTIME-complete. Wide acceptance in space, the machine accepting within its 2n2^n cells with no bound on time, is EXPSPACE-complete, deterministic or not. Membership reads a wide machine as an ordinary one over an exponential expansion; hardness lays the computation of a problem of the class out along the addresses.

    The same reading gives tilings one exponential up, the rows of a tiling being the configurations of a wide machine: tiling the square of side 2n2^n is NEXPTIME-complete, and tiling the corridor of width 2n2^n and unbounded height is EXPSPACE-complete. Each wide acceptance problem has yes-instances, so that none of the completeness results is about an empty problem.

    The proofs are those of version 1.2.2 of the library, sliced to what these statements use; they assume the submission's own statements and those of the submissions it requires where they compose. The library and its documentation are at https://github.com/PierreSenellart/descriptive-complexity and https://pierresenellart.github.io/descriptive-complexity/DescriptiveComplexity.html. The Lean code was written with the assistance of several Claude models; the design and the statements are the author's.

    Concepts

    Concept map
    24 concepts
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis submissionOther submissionA → B: B builds on A

    Proofs

    Proof networkview on GitHub

    100%
    assumptions conclusionProven claimStatement 1, 2, … of a claim with several statementsClaim from this submissionProof — open large view for details
    Proof list

    Lean sources for these proofs: proofs/ on GitHub

    Proof code is not displayed; the archive records each proof's checked relationship between claims.

    Related submissions

    Submission map

    100%
    This submissionOther submissionA → B: B's concepts build on A

    Cite this

    This is only the formalizers. The authors of the formalized results may be different (see References).

    @misc{lax-822549,
      author = {Pierre Senellart and Claude (Anthropic)},
      title = {Descriptive complexity: wide machines and tilings},
      year = {2026},
      howpublished = {Lax Archive, lax-822549},
      url = {https://laxarchive.org/lax-822549/},
      note = {draft},
    }

    References

    1. Pierre Senellart and Anton Gnatenko. Descriptive Complexity in Lean: Completeness by First-Order Reductions. 2026. arXiv:2609.18261
    2. Pierre Senellart. DescriptiveComplexity: Completeness by First-Order Reductions in Lean. 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.21678423 · github.com/PierreSenellart/descriptive-complexity

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…