Welzl Orders of Cographs
No public endorsements yet.
Loading review…
Sign in with ORCIDAbstract
The neighborhood set systems of cographs have logarithmic, and sometimes necessarily logarithmic, Welzl orders. Every cograph on n vertices admits an order crossed at most times by each open neighborhood. Conversely, for every k there is a cograph on between and vertices for which every vertex order is crossed at least k times by some open neighborhood. Thus the worst possible crossing number is , already inside the graphs of twin-width zero.
The concept surface has three review units. The first defines cographs as the finite graphs admitting a width-zero twin-width contraction sequence. This is the standard twin-width characterization of cographs: zero is the correct value under the convention that red degree itself is the width. The other two concepts state the matching logarithmic lower and upper bounds, using the registered definition of Welzl orders and the open radius-one neighborhood set system.
The lower-bound construction is the underlying graph of the transitive closure of a complete rooted ternary tree. Passing from depth k to depth adds a universal root above three disjoint copies, or equivalently adds two alternating levels to its cotree. In every order one of the three copies is separated from the new root by nonneighbors, forcing one additional crossing. For the upper bound, a heavy root path of a cotree is removed at each round. Ordering the off-path subtrees first by join nodes from the root downward and then by union nodes in reverse makes every vertex's external neighborhood use at most two intervals. The number of rounds is the Strahler rank of the cotree, at most .
Concepts
Concept map
Proofs
Proof networkview on GitHub
-
⊢
Lax214022Proofs.CographWelzlLowerBound.exists_cograph_requiring_crossingNumber_at_least -
⊢
Lax214022Proofs.CographWelzlUpperBound.exists_welzlOrder_crossingNumber_le_four_clog_add_one
Lean sources for these proofs: proofs/ on GitHub
Proof code is not displayed; the archive records each proof's checked relationship between claims.
Related submissions
Submission map
Cite this
@misc{lax-214022,
author = {Clemens Kuske and Codex (OpenAI)},
title = {Welzl Orders of Cographs},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Lax Archive, lax-214022},
url = {https://laxarchive.org/lax-214022/},
note = {draft},
}
References
- Édouard Bonnet, Eun Jung Kim, Stéphan Thomassé and Rémi Watrigant. Twin-width I: Tractable FO Model Checking. In 2020 IEEE 61st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) 601–612, 2020. doi:10.1109/FOCS46700.2020.00062
- Christophe Crespelle and Philippe Gambette. Linear-Time Constant-Ratio Approximation Algorithm and Tight Bounds for the Contiguity of Cographs. In Algorithms and Computation – WALCOM 2013 7748:126–136, 2013. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36065-7_13
Community review
Discussion
Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above; your ORCID profile must share a public name.
0 comments