While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

Entropy bounded container families

Lax342547.EntropyContainers · concepts/Lax342547/EntropyContainers.lean · lax-342547

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Lemma

    Compact convex feasible laws with an entropy budget and uniform conflict supersaturation admit a finite family of infeasible containers covering every independent set. Ordered fingerprints obey the same exponential counting budget as the paper.

    Concept map
    16 concepts; 9 descendants hidden
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on A
    Evidence

    This concept declares 3 statements. Each proof establishes one of them relative to its assumptions.

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax342547.EntropySelectors
    2import Lax342547.ContainerRun
    3import Lax342547.FingerprintCounts
    4
    5/-!
    6---
    7title: Entropy bounded container families
    8type: lemma
    9---
    10Compact convex feasible laws with an entropy budget and uniform conflict supersaturation admit a finite family of infeasible containers covering every independent set. Ordered fingerprints obey the same exponential counting budget as the paper.
    11-/
    12
    13namespace Lax342547.EntropyContainers
    14
    15open Lax342547.RelativeEntropy Lax342547.ContainerLaws Lax342547.ContainerRun
    16open scoped BigOperators
    17
    18axiom entropy_increment_positive (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1) : 0 < -Real.log (1-ε)
    19
    20axiom entropy_fingerprint_length {U : Type} [Fintype U]
    21 (P : Set (U → ℝ)) (q : U → ℝ) (H : U → U → Prop) (ε B : ℝ)
    22 (law : Finset U → U → ℝ) (pick : Finset U → U) (I R : Finset U) (fuel L : ℕ)
    23 (hprob : ∀ ρ ∈ P, Probability ρ) (hc : Convex ℝ P)
    24 (hb : ∀ ρ ∈ P, 0 ≤ entropy ρ q ∧ entropy ρ q ≤ B)
    25 (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1)
    26 (hspec : ∀ T, (residual P T).Nonempty →
    27 law T ∈ residual P T ∧ (∀ σ ∈ residual P T, entropy (law T) q ≤ entropy σ q) ∧
    28 pick T ∈ T ∧ ε ≤ neighborMass (law T) H (pick T) ∧ (∃ w ∈ T, H (pick T) w))
    29 (hL : B/(-Real.log (1-ε))+1 ≤ L) (hactive : (residual P R).Nonempty) :
    30 (run (fun T => (residual P T).Nonempty) pick H I fuel R).2.length ≤ L
    31
    32axiom entropy_container_family {U : Type} [Fintype U] [Nonempty U]
    33 (P : Set (U → ℝ)) (q : U → ℝ) (H : U → U → Prop) (ε B : ℝ) (L : ℕ)
    34 (hcompact : IsCompact P) (hconvex : Convex ℝ P) (hprob : ∀ ρ ∈ P, Probability ρ)
    35 (hbudget : ∀ ρ ∈ P, 0 ≤ entropy ρ q ∧ entropy ρ q ≤ B)
    36 (hε : 0 < ε) (hε1 : ε < 1)
    37 (hL : B/(-Real.log (1-ε))+1 ≤ L)
    38 (hsuper : ∀ ρ ∈ P, ε ≤ conflictMass ρ H) :
    39 ∃ C : Finset (Finset U),
    40 C.card ≤ (Fintype.card U+1)^L ∧
    41 (∀ R ∈ C, ¬ (residual P R).Nonempty) ∧
    42 (∀ I : Finset U, (∀ x ∈ I, ∀ y ∈ I, ¬ H x y) → ∃ R ∈ C, I ⊆ R)
    43
    44end Lax342547.EntropyContainers
    45
    Show ProofShow ProofShow Proof

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…