While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

Squared restriction cost for independent unit events

Lax342547.PairRecovery · concepts/Lax342547/PairRecovery.lean · lax-342547

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Lemma

    A normalized restriction is dominated pointwise by its original PMF after multiplication by the retained mass. Independent pair events therefore lose precisely the square of that mass.

    Concept map
    7 concepts
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on ADescendants are omitted for concepts with more than 10 descendants.
    Evidence

    This concept declares 6 statements. Each proof establishes one of them relative to its assumptions.

    1 independent_pair_apply proven

    2 pair_mass_domination proven

    3 pair_mass_pmf_event proven

    4 real_filter_domination proven

    5 restriction_pair_event_recovery proven

    6 restriction_pair_recovery proven

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax342547.RealCellLaws
    2import Lax342547.Conditioning
    3
    4/-!
    5---
    6title: Squared restriction cost for independent unit events
    7type: lemma
    8---
    9A normalized restriction is dominated pointwise by its original PMF after multiplication by the retained mass. Independent pair events therefore lose precisely the square of that mass.
    10-/
    11
    12namespace Lax342547.PairRecovery
    13
    14open Lax342547.RealCellLaws
    15open scoped ENNReal
    16
    17noncomputable def pairMass {ΩA ΩB : Type} [Fintype ΩA] [Fintype ΩB]
    18 (α : ΩA → ℝ) (β : ΩB → ℝ) (H : ΩA → ΩB → Prop) : ℝ := by
    19 classical
    20 exact ∑ a, ∑ b, if H a b then α a * β b else 0
    21
    22axiom pair_mass_domination {ΩA ΩB : Type} [Fintype ΩA] [Fintype ΩB]
    23 (α ρ : ΩA → ℝ) (β σ : ΩB → ℝ) (mA mB : ℝ) (H : ΩA → ΩB → Prop)
    24 (hmA : 0 ≤ mA) (hmB : 0 ≤ mB) (hρ : ∀ a, 0 ≤ ρ a) (hσ : ∀ b, 0 ≤ σ b)
    25 (hα : ∀ a, mA * ρ a ≤ α a) (hβ : ∀ b, mB * σ b ≤ β b) :
    26 mA * mB * pairMass ρ σ H ≤ pairMass α β H
    27
    28axiom real_filter_domination {Ω : Type} [Fintype Ω] (p : PMF Ω) (S : Set Ω)
    29 (hS : ∃ o ∈ S, o ∈ p.support) (ω : Ω) :
    30 (p.toOuterMeasure S).toReal * weights (p.filter S hS) ω ≤ weights p ω
    31
    32axiom restriction_pair_recovery {Ω : Type} [Fintype Ω] (p : PMF Ω) (S : Set Ω)
    33 (hS : ∃ o ∈ S, o ∈ p.support) (H : Ω → Ω → Prop) :
    34 ((p.toOuterMeasure S).toReal)^2 * pairMass (weights (p.filter S hS)) (weights (p.filter S hS)) H ≤
    35 pairMass (weights p) (weights p) H
    36
    37noncomputable def independentPair {ΩA ΩB : Type} (p : PMF ΩA) (q : PMF ΩB) : PMF (ΩA × ΩB) :=
    38 p.bind (fun a => q.map (fun b => (a,b)))
    39
    40axiom independent_pair_apply {ΩA ΩB : Type} [Fintype ΩA] [Fintype ΩB]
    41 (p : PMF ΩA) (q : PMF ΩB) (ab : ΩA × ΩB) :
    42 independentPair p q ab = p ab.1 * q ab.2
    43
    44axiom pair_mass_pmf_event {ΩA ΩB : Type} [Fintype ΩA] [Fintype ΩB]
    45 (p : PMF ΩA) (q : PMF ΩB) (H : ΩA → ΩB → Prop) :
    46 pairMass (weights p) (weights q) H =
    47 ((independentPair p q).toOuterMeasure {ab | H ab.1 ab.2}).toReal
    48
    49axiom restriction_pair_event_recovery {Ω : Type} [Fintype Ω]
    50 (p : PMF Ω) (S : Set Ω) (hS : ∃ o ∈ S, o ∈ p.support) (H : Ω → Ω → Prop) :
    51 ((p.toOuterMeasure S).toReal)^2 *
    52 ((independentPair (p.filter S hS) (p.filter S hS)).toOuterMeasure {ab | H ab.1 ab.2}).toReal ≤
    53 ((independentPair p p).toOuterMeasure {ab | H ab.1 ab.2}).toReal
    54
    55end Lax342547.PairRecovery
    56
    Show ProofShow ProofShow ProofShow ProofShow ProofShow Proof

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…