While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

Depth Hierarchies for Symmetric Algebraic Circuits

lax-461425·formalized by Anuj Dawar @anuj-dawar · Prateek Dwivedi @prateekdwv · Benedikt Pago @BenediktPago · Tim Seppelt @tseppelt·created ·GitHub @608ce5d·Lean v4.33.0 epoch · mathlib db584cd6d46c

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this submission may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this submission

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    Abstract

    This submission formalises a depth hierarchy theorem for matrix-symmetric algebraic circuits, together with the characterisation of bounded-depth matrix-symmetric circuits by homomorphism polynomials on which it rests. A circuit with variables xi,jx_{i,j} for i,j∈[n]i, j \in [n] is matrix-symmetric if every permutation of rows and columns extends to an automorphism of the circuit. Its orbit size is the maximum size of an orbit of gates under these automorphisms, its support size is the least kk such that every gate is fixed by the pointwise stabiliser of some set of at most kk rows and columns, and its support depth is the maximum number of wires along a path at which the minimal support of a gate is not contained in that of its parent.

    Depth hierarchy. For Δ≥1\Delta \geq 1, let TΔ,nT_{\Delta,n} be the full nn-ary tree of depth Δ\Delta, viewed as a bipartite pattern. Over a field of characteristic zero, for n≥20n \geq 20, every reduced matrix-symmetric circuit of support depth at most Δ\Delta computing the homomorphism polynomial hom⁡TΔ,n,n\hom_{T_{\Delta,n},n} has orbit size at least nlog⁡2n−Δlog⁡2log⁡2n−3n^{\log_2 n - \Delta \log_2 \log_2 n - 3}, whereas for n≥5n \geq 5 it is computed by a reduced matrix-symmetric circuit of support depth at most Δ+1\Delta + 1 and orbit size at most n2n^2.

    Characterisation. The patterns are measured by their Δ\Delta-forestwidth fwΔ(F)\mathrm{fw}_\Delta(F), the least width of a tree decomposition of FF of depth at most Δ\Delta with an empty root bag, a variant of the Δ\Delta-treewidth of Bhargav, Chen, Curticapean, and Dwivedi. For Δ≥1\Delta \geq 1, k≥2k \geq 2, and n≥2k+1n \geq 2k+1, a polynomial pp in the n×nn \times n matrix variables is computed by a reduced matrix-symmetric circuit of support size at most kk and support depth at most Δ\Delta if, and only if, pp is a linear combination of homomorphism polynomials hom⁡F,n\hom_{F,n} of bipartite multigraphs FF with fwΔ(F)≤k−1\mathrm{fw}_\Delta(F) \leq k-1. One direction is an explicit circuit construction for a single pattern, which additionally bounds orbit size, depth, and size; the other extracts homomorphism polynomials from a circuit by induction on its gates. Reduced matrix-symmetric circuits are shown to be rigid, and every matrix-symmetric circuit is shown to admit a reduced one computing the same polynomial without increasing size, depth, or orbit size.

    Further ingredients. The lower bound combines the characterisation with two further results, both proved here. The first is a support theorem: for n≥20n \geq 20 and 3κ≤n+23\kappa \leq n + 2, a reduced matrix-symmetric circuit of orbit size less than (nκ)\binom{n}{\kappa} has support size at most κ−1\kappa - 1. It is derived from a self-contained proof, for n≥20n \geq 20, of the theorem of Dixon and Mortimer that a subgroup of Symn\mathrm{Sym}_n of small index contains the pointwise stabiliser of a small set in the alternating group, via Bochert's bound on bases of groups without 3-cycles, an analysis of orbits and block systems, and the simplicity of the alternating group. The second is a non-uniform homomorphism distinguishing closure result: if a graph class F\mathcal{F} contains K1K_1 and is closed under minors and under Roberson's weak oddomorphisms, G∉FG \notin \mathcal{F} is connected, and GG is a minor of the underlying graph of FF, then hom⁡F,N\hom_{F,N} is not in the linear span of the homomorphism polynomials of patterns in F\mathcal{F} for every NN at least the size of a CFI graph of GG. Its proof uses CFI graphs, a contraction formula for homomorphism counts, and a lifting of minor models.

    Concepts

    Concept map
    19 concepts
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis submissionOther submissionA → B: B builds on A

    Proofs

    Proof networkview on GitHub

    100%
    premise files concept fileProven claimClaim from this submissionAll proofs of one concept — hover for individual statements and proofs
    Proof list

    Proof code is not displayed; the archive records each proof's checked relationship between claims.

    Related submissions

    Submission map

    100%
    This submissionOther submissionA → B: B's concepts build on A

    Cite this

    This is only the formalizers. The authors of the formalized results may be different (see References).

    @misc{lax-461425,
      author = {Anuj Dawar and Prateek Dwivedi and Benedikt Pago and Tim Seppelt},
      title = {Depth Hierarchies for Symmetric Algebraic Circuits},
      year = {2026},
      howpublished = {Lax Archive, lax-461425},
      url = {https://laxarchive.org/lax-461425/},
      note = {draft},
    }

    References

    1. Anuj Dawar and Gregory Wilsenach. Symmetric Arithmetic Circuits. In 47th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2020) 168:36:1–36:18, 2020. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ICALP.2020.36
    2. Anuj Dawar, Benedikt Pago and Tim Seppelt. Symmetric Algebraic Circuits and Homomorphism Polynomials. In 17th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2026) 362:46:1–46:15, 2026. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2026.46
    3. Prateek Dwivedi, Benedikt Pago and Tim Seppelt. Lower Bounds in Algebraic Complexity via Symmetry and Homomorphism Polynomials. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2026) 631–640, 2026. doi:10.1145/3798129.3800779
    4. C. S. Bhargav, Shiteng Chen, Radu Curticapean and Prateek Dwivedi. Monotone Bounded-Depth Complexity of Homomorphism Polynomials. In 50th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2025) 345:19:1–19:18, 2025. doi:10.4230/LIPIcs.MFCS.2025.19
    5. John D. Dixon and Brian Mortimer. Permutation Groups. Springer 163, 1996.
    6. David E. Roberson. Oddomorphisms and homomorphism indistinguishability over graphs of bounded degree. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 181:1–61, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jctb.2026.07.003
    7. Jin-Yi Cai, Martin Fürer and Neil Immerman. An optimal lower bound on the number of variables for graph identification. Combinatorica 12(4):389–410, 1992. doi:10.1007/BF01305232

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…