While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

Symmetric skew circuits from symmetric ABPs

Lax461425.SkewFromABP · concepts/Lax461425/SkewFromABP.lean · lax-461425

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Theorem

    Over every commutative semiring, a family of polynomials computed by matrix-symmetric ABPs with polynomial vertex orbits is computed by matrix-symmetric skew circuits with polynomial gate orbits, that is, symVBP⊆symVSsymVBP ⊆ symVS.

    Concept map
    9 concepts; 2 descendants hidden
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on A
    Evidence

    Each proof establishes this claim relative to its assumptions.

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax461425.SymmetricABPs
    2
    3/-!
    4---
    5title: Symmetric skew circuits from symmetric ABPs
    6type: theorem
    7---
    8Over every commutative semiring, a family of polynomials computed by matrix-symmetric ABPs
    9with polynomial vertex orbits is computed by matrix-symmetric skew circuits with polynomial
    10gate orbits, that is, `symVBP ⊆ symVS`.
    11-/
    12
    13namespace Lax461425.SkewFromABP
    14
    15open SymmetricABPs SymmetricFamilies SymmetricClasses
    16
    17/-- Families with symmetric polynomial-orbit ABPs have symmetric polynomial-orbit skew
    18circuits, over every commutative semiring. -/
    19axiom inSymVS_of_inSymVBP {K : Type*} [CommSemiring K] (f : MatrixFamily K)
    20 (hf : InSymVBP f) : InSymVS f
    21
    22end Lax461425.SkewFromABP
    23
    Show Proof

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…