While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

Strict functional boundedness of graph parameters

Lax825442.StrictlyBounds · concepts/Lax825442/StrictlyBounds.lean · lax-825442

definition

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Definition

    A graph parameter p strictly bounds q when q is bounded by a nondecreasing function of p on all finite simple graphs, but p admits no functional bound in terms of q. This does not assert a pointwise strict inequality between their values. It is the strict part of functional boundedness.

    Concept map
    4 concepts; 2 descendants hidden
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on A

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax825442.DoesNotBound
    2
    3/-!
    4---
    5title: Strict functional boundedness of graph parameters
    6type: definition
    7---
    8A graph parameter p strictly bounds q when q is bounded by a nondecreasing
    9function of p on all finite simple graphs, but p admits no functional bound
    10in terms of q. This does not assert a pointwise strict inequality between
    11their values. It is the strict part of functional boundedness.
    12-/
    13
    14namespace Lax825442.StrictlyBounds
    15
    16open Lax153141.GraphParameters
    17
    18/-- Functional boundedness holds in one direction and fails in the reverse. -/
    19def StrictlyBounds (p q : GraphParam) : Prop :=
    20 (Lax825442.Bounds.Bounds p q) ∧
    21 (Lax825442.DoesNotBound.DoesNotBound q p)
    22
    23end Lax825442.StrictlyBounds
    24

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…