While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

Invariance and characterization of deterministic machine acceptance

Lax535992.DeterministicMachineInvariance · concepts/Lax535992/DeterministicMachineInvariance.lean · lax-535992

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Lemma

    Being a well-formed, deterministic and accepting machine instance is invariant under isomorphism of instances, and an instance is a yes-instance of deterministic machine acceptance exactly when it is well-formed, deterministic and accepting.

    Concept map
    24 concepts
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on A
    Evidence

    This concept declares 2 statements. Each proof establishes one of them relative to its assumptions.

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax904597.Problems
    2import Lax904597.Interpretations
    3import Lax904597.Relativized
    4import Lax904597.SecondOrder
    5import Lax904597.Classes
    6import Lax904597.Sat
    7import Lax904597.Machines
    8import Lax485149.Problems
    9import Lax485149.Complement
    10import Lax485149.SecondOrderAtoms
    11import Lax485149.TransitiveClosure
    12import Lax485149.DeterministicTransitiveClosure
    13import Lax485149.ClassNL
    14import Lax485149.ClassL
    15import Lax535992.HornFragment
    16import Lax535992.LeastFixedPoint
    17import Lax535992.InflationaryFixedPoint
    18import Lax535992.HornSat
    19import Lax535992.CircuitValue
    20import Lax535992.Game
    21import Lax535992.DeterministicMachines
    22import Lax535992.ClassPTIME
    23
    24/-!
    25---
    26title: Invariance and characterization of deterministic machine acceptance
    27type: lemma
    28---
    29Being a well-formed, deterministic and accepting machine instance is
    30invariant under isomorphism of instances, and an instance is a yes-instance
    31of deterministic machine acceptance exactly when it is well-formed,
    32deterministic and accepting.
    33-/
    34
    35namespace Lax535992.DeterministicMachineInvariance
    36
    37open FirstOrder FirstOrder.Language
    38open Lax904597.Problems Lax904597.Interpretations Lax904597.Relativized Lax904597.SecondOrder
    39open Lax904597.Classes Lax904597.Sat Lax904597.Machines
    40open Lax485149.Problems Lax485149.Complement Lax485149.SecondOrderAtoms
    41open Lax485149.TransitiveClosure Lax485149.DeterministicTransitiveClosure
    42open Lax485149.ClassNL Lax485149.ClassL
    43open Lax535992.HornFragment Lax535992.LeastFixedPoint Lax535992.InflationaryFixedPoint
    44open Lax535992.HornSat Lax535992.CircuitValue Lax535992.Game Lax535992.DeterministicMachines
    45open Lax535992.ClassPTIME
    46
    47/-- Being well-formed, deterministic and accepting is isomorphism-invariant. -/
    48axiom dtmAccepts_iso : ∀ {A B : Type} [turing.Structure A] [turing.Structure B],
    49 (A ≃[turing] B) →
    50 (((tmData A).WellFormed ∧ TMData.Deterministic (tmData A) ∧ (tmData A).Accepts) ↔
    51 ((tmData B).WellFormed ∧ TMData.Deterministic (tmData B) ∧ (tmData B).Accepts))
    52
    53/-- The yes-instances of deterministic machine acceptance are exactly the
    54well-formed, deterministic and accepting instances. -/
    55axiom dtmAccept_iff : ∀ (A : Type) [turing.Structure A],
    56 DTMAccept A ↔
    57 ((tmData A).WellFormed ∧ TMData.Deterministic (tmData A) ∧ (tmData A).Accepts)
    58
    59end Lax535992.DeterministicMachineInvariance
    60
    Show ProofShow Proof

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…