While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

A width obstruction from sparse costs and bounded route loads

Lax263307.CostSamplingObstruction · concepts/Lax263307/CostSamplingObstruction.lean · lax-263307

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Theorem

    Assume vertex costs lie in [0,1][0,1], have total mass at most k>0k>0, and edge cost at most k2/pk^2/p. A route distribution with vertex loads at most ℓxv/k\ell x_v/k satisfies the sampling budgets for any source graph with mm edges when k≥8m2ℓ2k\ge8m^2\ell^2 and p≥16m2ℓ2p\ge16m^2\ell^2. Consequently, for a source graph of maximum degree dd, a monotone class bag bound WW forces a discarded-edge count qq with Lq≤4mℓLq\le4m\ell and the pruned source treewidth-plus-one bound.

    Concept map
    32 concepts; 9 descendants hidden
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on A
    Evidence

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax263307.InducedEmbeddingWidth
    2
    3/-!
    4---
    5title: A width obstruction from sparse costs and bounded route loads
    6type: theorem
    7---
    8Assume vertex costs lie in [0,1][0,1], have total mass at most k>0k>0, and
    9edge cost at most k2/pk^2/p. A route distribution with vertex loads at most
    10ℓxv/k\ell x_v/k satisfies the sampling budgets for any source graph with
    11mm edges when k≥8m2ℓ2k\ge8m^2\ell^2 and p≥16m2ℓ2p\ge16m^2\ell^2.
    12Consequently, for a source graph of maximum degree dd, a monotone class
    13bag bound WW forces a discarded-edge count qq with
    14Lq≤4mℓLq\le4m\ell and the pruned source treewidth-plus-one bound.
    15
    16# Formalization notes
    17
    18The class bag bound is still an explicit intermediate hypothesis. This
    19combines the proved probability estimates and sampled width obstruction;
    20it does not yet derive the class bound from separators.
    21
    22# Attribution
    23
    24Bonnet–Chang, the sparse-cost sampling contradiction in Lemma 11.
    25-/
    26
    27namespace Lax263307.CostSamplingObstruction
    28
    29open Lax263307.GraphClasses Lax263307.InducedEmbeddingWidth Lax228581.Treewidth
    30
    31axiom cost_width_obstruction {t n q : ℕ} (C : GraphClass) (hereditary : IsHereditary C)
    32 (W : ℕ → ℕ) (monotone : Monotone W) (class_bound : HasBagBound C W)
    33 (H : SimpleGraph (Fin t)) [DecidableRel H.Adj] (G : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
    34 (member : G ∈ C n) (D : Lax263307.RouteDistributions.Distribution G q) (hn : 0 < n)
    35 (d L : ℕ) (degree_bound : ∀ v, H.degree v ≤ d) (edge_positive : 0 < H.edgeSet.ncard)
    36 (x : Fin n → ℝ) (k ℓ p : ℝ) (k_positive : 0 < k) (ℓ_positive : 0 < ℓ) (p_positive : 0 < p)
    37 (cost_bounds : ∀ v, 0 ≤ x v ∧ x v ≤ 1) (mass : (∑ v, x v) ≤ k)
    38 (load_bound : ∀ v, Lax263307.PathSampling.load D.toSampling v ≤ ℓ * x v / k)
    39 (edge_bound : Lax263307.Entropy.edgeCost G x ≤ k ^ 2 / p)
    40 (target_large : 8 * (H.edgeSet.ncard : ℝ) ^ 2 * ℓ ^ 2 ≤ k)
    41 (sparsity_large : 16 * (H.edgeSet.ncard : ℝ) ^ 2 * ℓ ^ 2 ≤ p) :
    42 ∃ removed : ℕ, (L : ℝ) * removed ≤ 4 * (H.edgeSet.ncard : ℝ) * ℓ ∧
    43 treewidth H + 1 ≤ max 1 (2 * d * W (d * H.edgeSet.ncard * L ^ 2)) + removed
    44
    45end Lax263307.CostSamplingObstruction
    46
    Show Proof
    Formalization notes

    The class bag bound is still an explicit intermediate hypothesis. This combines the proved probability estimates and sampled width obstruction; it does not yet derive the class bound from separators.

    Attribution

    Bonnet–Chang, the sparse-cost sampling contradiction in Lemma 11.

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…