While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

Valid separating inequalities from independent-set bounds

Lax263307.ComponentCuts · concepts/Lax263307/ComponentCuts.lean · lax-263307

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Theorem

    Suppose every independent set in G[C]G[C] has size at most uu. For ∣A∣≤r|A|\le r, every z∈Pr(G,k)z\in P_r(G,k) satisfies

    ∑v∈CzA∪{v}≤uzA.\sum_{v\in C}z_{A\cup\{v\}}\le u z_A.

    A query yy with yA>0y_A>0 violates this inequality precisely when its conditioned costs satisfy ∑v∈Cxv>u\sum_{v\in C}x_v>u.

    Concept map
    2 concepts
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on ADescendants are omitted for concepts with more than 10 descendants.
    Evidence

    This concept declares 2 statements. Each proof establishes one of them relative to its assumptions.

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax263307.LinearRelaxation
    2
    3/-!
    4---
    5title: Valid separating inequalities from independent-set bounds
    6type: theorem
    7---
    8Suppose every independent set in G[C]G[C] has size at most uu.
    9For ∣A∣≤r|A|\le r, every z∈Pr(G,k)z\in P_r(G,k) satisfies
    10∑v∈CzA∪{v}≤uzA.\sum_{v\in C}z_{A\cup\{v\}}\le u z_A.
    11A query yy with yA>0y_A>0 violates this inequality precisely when its
    12conditioned costs satisfy ∑v∈Cxv>u\sum_{v\in C}x_v>u.
    13
    14# Attribution
    15
    16Bonnet–Chang, Lemma 13. The set CC need not be a connected component;
    17the algorithm applies this statement to the components left by a separator.
    18-/
    19
    20namespace Lax263307.ComponentCuts
    21
    22open LinearRelaxation
    23
    24/-- A certified independence bound supplies an inequality valid on the exact hull. -/
    25axiom valid_cut {n : ℕ} (G : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) (k r : ℕ)
    26 (C : Finset (Fin n)) (u : ℕ) (bound : IsIndependenceBound G C u)
    27 (A : Finset (Fin n)) (size : A.card ≤ r)
    28 (z : MomentVector n r) (member : z ∈ independentSetHull G k r) :
    29 ∑ v ∈ C, value z (insert v A) ≤ (u : ℝ) * value z A
    30
    31/-- The exact rational test used to detect a violated cut. -/
    32axiom violation_iff {n r : ℕ} (y : MomentVector n r)
    33 (A C : Finset (Fin n)) (u : ℕ) (positive : 0 < value y A) :
    34 (u : ℝ) < ∑ v ∈ C, conditioned y A v ↔
    35 (u : ℝ) * value y A < ∑ v ∈ C, value y (insert v A)
    36
    37end Lax263307.ComponentCuts
    38
    Show ProofShow Proof

    Attribution

    Bonnet–Chang, Lemma 13. The set CC need not be a connected component; the algorithm applies this statement to the components left by a separator.

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…