Sibling proof with the conclusion in the middle
Lax771644.SiblingConclusionMiddle · concepts/Lax771644/SiblingConclusionMiddle.lean · lax-771644
No public endorsements yet.
Loading review…
Sign in with ORCIDNatural Language Statement
Theorem
Statement 2 is proved from statements 1 and 3, so the turnstile sits below the middle dock with one assumption arriving from the left and one from the right.
Concept map
Evidence
Lean source view on GitHub
| 1 | import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Notation |
| 2 | import Lax771644.Foundations |
| 3 | |
| 4 | /-! |
| 5 | --- |
| 6 | title: Sibling proof with the conclusion in the middle |
| 7 | type: theorem |
| 8 | --- |
| 9 | Statement 2 is proved from statements 1 and 3, so the turnstile sits below the |
| 10 | middle dock with one assumption arriving from the left and one from the right. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | # Formalization notes |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Again the same ladder in a fresh band of rungs. |
| 15 | -/ |
| 16 | |
| 17 | namespace Lax771644.SiblingConclusionMiddle |
| 18 | |
| 19 | /-- Descent from stage 32 to stage 31. -/ |
| 20 | axiom s1 : Foundations.Descent 32 31 |
| 21 | |
| 22 | /-- Descent from stage 32 to stage 30, the composite of its two neighbours. -/ |
| 23 | axiom s2 : Foundations.Descent 32 30 |
| 24 | |
| 25 | /-- Descent from stage 31 to stage 30. -/ |
| 26 | axiom s3 : Foundations.Descent 31 30 |
| 27 | |
| 28 | end Lax771644.SiblingConclusionMiddle |
| 29 |
Formalization notes
Again the same ladder in a fresh band of rungs.
Discussion
Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.
0 comments