Proof of `Lemma 2` (2nd statement)

groundedproofs/Lax496464Proofs/Section4.lean · lax-496464

What this proof establishes

no assumptions

Assuming the claims on the left, the claim on the right holds — checked by the archive's pipeline. Proof code is not displayed here.

Read the Lean proof on GitHub

Description

Equation (4). Nothing starts in (t′,t](t', t], so the alive set only loses jj, and a state at tt comes from a state at t′t' that either contained jj or did not.