Proof of `Lemma 1`
What this proof establishes
no assumptions
thm✓
Lax496464.Lemma1Assuming the claims on the left, the claim on the right holds — checked by the archive's pipeline. Proof code is not displayed here.
In the paper
- page 4 of this submission's paper
Description
Recursion (1), proved in as . The branch in which is passed over needs to admit every set the old thresholds admitted, and the branch in which is taken needs the converse; both are Hall's theorem applied to the map sending a job to the threshold it runs behind.