Proof of `Why-provenance is an m-semiring` (2nd statement)
groundedproofs/Lax392996Proofs/Bridge.lean · lax-392996
What this proof establishes
no assumptions
Assuming the claims on the left, the claim on the right holds — checked by the archive's pipeline. Proof code is not displayed here.
In the paper
- page 17 of this submission's paper
Description
The instance exhibited in the concept, whose fields verify the laws: the Galois connection of the monus with inclusion, and the laws of a commutative semiring under union and pairwise union.