Proof of `Exhaustive search for small independent-set targets` (3rd statement)
groundedproofs/Lax263307Proofs/ExhaustiveTargets.lean · lax-263307
What this proof establishes
Assuming the claims on the left, the claim on the right holds — checked by the archive's pipeline. Proof code is not displayed here.
Description
The first successful candidate is an independent set of size . If an independent set had size at least after failure, selecting a size- subset would give a successful candidate, a contradiction.
Attribution
Bonnet–Chang, exhaustive-search rejection in Lemma 14.