Proof of `A statement whose name is its concept's name` (2nd statement)
groundedproofs/Lax771644Proofs/WholeConceptAssumption.lean · lax-771644
What this proof establishes
Assuming the claims on the left, the claim on the right holds — checked by the archive's pipeline. Proof code is not displayed here.
Description
The numbered sibling follows from the concept-named statement.
Proof strategy
Apply the concept-named statement and weaken one rung.
Attribution
Synthetic: written for this benchmark. The mathematics is a one-line divisibility weakening; only the shape of the dependency edges is the point.