While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

Small actual greedy exposure tails

Lax342547.GreedyTails · concepts/Lax342547/GreedyTails.lean · lax-342547

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Lemma

    Greedy exposure bounds the actual sum of projected mode dimensions minus their span increase by a dyadic tail deficit, yielding a small tail at an explicit scale.

    Concept map
    8 concepts
    100%
    Proven claimThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on ADescendants are omitted for concepts with more than 10 descendants.
    Evidence

    This concept declares 3 statements. Each proof establishes one of them relative to its assumptions.

    1 greedy_deficit_bound proven

    2 greedy_tail_bound proven

    3 small_greedy_tail proven

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax342547.GreedySpans
    2import Lax342547.ListTails
    3import Lax342547.DyadicScale
    4import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.List
    5
    6/-!
    7---
    8title: Small actual greedy exposure tails
    9type: lemma
    10---
    11Greedy exposure bounds the actual sum of projected mode dimensions minus their span increase by a dyadic tail deficit, yielding a small tail at an explicit scale.
    12-/
    13
    14namespace Lax342547.GreedyTails
    15
    16open Lax342547.GreedySpans Lax342547.ListTails Lax342547.DyadicTails
    17open scoped BigOperators
    18
    19noncomputable def deficit {K V ι : Type} [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
    20 [FiniteDimensional K V] (S : ι → Submodule K V) (W : Submodule K V) (l : List ι) : ℝ :=
    21 (l.map (fun i => gain W (S i))).sum-(increments S W l).sum
    22
    23axiom greedy_deficit_bound {K V ι : Type} [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
    24 [FiniteDimensional K V] (S : ι → Submodule K V) (W : Submodule K V) (l : List ι)
    25 (hg : Greedy S W l) (hl : l ≠ []) :
    26 deficit S W l ≤ (l.length : ℝ)*value (increments S W l) 0-(increments S W l).sum
    27
    28axiom greedy_tail_bound {K V ι : Type} [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
    29 [FiniteDimensional K V] (S : ι → Submodule K V) (W : Submodule K V) (l : List ι)
    30 (hg : Greedy S W l) (b : ℕ) (hb : 0 < b) (hbl : b ≤ l.length) :
    31 deficit S (spanAfter S W (l.take (l.length-b))) (l.drop (l.length-b)) ≤
    32 (b : ℝ)*tailDeficit (value (increments S W l)) l.length b
    33
    34axiom small_greedy_tail {K V ι : Type} [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
    35 [FiniteDimensional K V] (S : ι → Submodule K V) (W : Submodule K V) (l : List ι)
    36 (hg : Greedy S W l) (r : ℝ) (hr : ∀ i ∈ l, (Module.finrank K (S i) : ℝ) ≤ r)
    37 (k n : ℕ) (hlen : l.length = 2^k) (hnk : n ≤ k) (hn : 8*r < n) :
    38 ∃ j < n, deficit S (spanAfter S W (l.take (l.length-2^(k-j))))
    39 (l.drop (l.length-2^(k-j))) < (2^(k-j) : ℝ)/4
    40
    41end Lax342547.GreedyTails
    42
    Show ProofShow ProofShow Proof

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…