While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

The fractional-coloring counterexample

Lax342547.FractionalCounterexample · concepts/Lax342547/FractionalCounterexample.lean · lax-342547

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Theorem

    Corollary 1.2 asserts that there are graphs of arbitrarily large order mm with independence number at most two and h(G)<26m/75+2/3<m/2≤χf(G)≤χ(G)h(G)<26m/75+2/3<m/2\le\chi_f(G)\le\chi(G). Here h(G)h(G) refers to ordinary clique minors.

    Concept map
    3 concepts
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on A
    Evidence

    Each proof establishes this claim relative to its assumptions.

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax342547.CliqueMinor
    2import Lax342547.FractionalColoring
    3
    4/-!
    5---
    6title: The fractional-coloring counterexample
    7type: theorem
    8---
    9Corollary 1.2 asserts that there are graphs of arbitrarily large order mm
    10with independence number at most two and
    11h(G)<26m/75+2/3<m/2≤χf(G)≤χ(G)h(G)<26m/75+2/3<m/2\le\chi_f(G)\le\chi(G).
    12Here h(G)h(G) refers to ordinary clique minors.
    13-/
    14
    15namespace Lax342547.FractionalCounterexample
    16
    17open CliqueMinor FractionalColoring
    18
    19axiom arbitrarily_large_fractional_counterexample (lowerBound : ℕ) :
    20 ∃ m : ℕ, lowerBound ≤ m ∧ 5 ≤ m ∧ ∃ G : SimpleGraph (Fin m),
    21 G.indepNum ≤ 2 ∧
    22 (hadwigerNumber G : ℝ) < 26 * (m : ℝ) / 75 + 2 / 3 ∧
    23 26 * (m : ℝ) / 75 + 2 / 3 < (m : ℝ) / 2 ∧
    24 (m : ℝ) / 2 ≤ fractionalChromaticNumber G ∧
    25 fractionalChromaticNumber G ≤ (G.chromaticNumber.toNat : ℝ)
    26
    27end Lax342547.FractionalCounterexample
    28
    Show Proof
    Builds on
    Used by

    none

    From Mathlib

    none

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…