While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

Cut profiles and the constant kernel

Lax342547.CutProfiles · concepts/Lax342547/CutProfiles.lean · lax-342547

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Lemma

    A cut profile has one coordinate for each unordered pair of tags, equal to the sum of its two representative values. In characteristic two, two representatives of the same profile differ by a constant tuple. For representatives in restricted spaces, that constant lies in their intersection. This is the kernel assertion of Lemma 2.3.

    Concept map
    2 concepts
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on ADescendants are omitted for concepts with more than 10 descendants.
    Evidence

    Each proof establishes this claim relative to its assumptions.

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax342547.MomentSpace
    2import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
    3
    4/-!
    5---
    6title: Cut profiles and the constant kernel
    7type: lemma
    8---
    9A cut profile has one coordinate for each unordered pair of tags, equal
    10to the sum of its two representative values. In characteristic two,
    11two representatives of the same profile differ by a constant tuple.
    12For representatives in restricted spaces, that constant lies in their
    13intersection. This is the kernel assertion of Lemma 2.3.
    14-/
    15
    16namespace Lax342547.CutProfiles
    17
    18open Lax342547.MomentSpace
    19
    20def Component (Tag : Type) := {e : Finset Tag // e.card = 2}
    21
    22variable {Tag V : Type} [AddCommGroup V] [Module Binary V]
    23
    24def cutMap : (Tag → V) →ₗ[Binary] (Component Tag → V) where
    25 toFun w e := ∑ t ∈ e.val, w t
    26 map_add' w v := by ext e; simp [Finset.sum_add_distrib]
    27 map_smul' c w := by ext e; simp [Finset.smul_sum]
    28
    29def representatives (W : Tag → Submodule Binary V) : Submodule Binary (Tag → V) :=
    30 Submodule.pi Set.univ W
    31
    32def cutSpace (W : Tag → Submodule Binary V) : Submodule Binary (Component Tag → V) :=
    33 (representatives W).map cutMap
    34
    35axiom same_cut_iff [Nonempty Tag] (W : Tag → Submodule Binary V)
    36 (w v : Tag → V) (hw : ∀ t, w t ∈ W t) (hv : ∀ t, v t ∈ W t) :
    37 cutMap w = cutMap v ↔ ∃ c ∈ ⨅ t, W t, ∀ t, w t + v t = c
    38
    39end Lax342547.CutProfiles
    40
    Show Proof

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…