Lax314295.FORelabellingOfAperiodicBimachine
Aperiodic bimachines compute first-order relabellings
concepts/Lax314295/FORelabellingOfAperiodicBimachine.lean · lax-314295
No public endorsements yet.
Loading review…
Sign in with ORCIDConcept map
Evidence
Each proof establishes this claim relative to its assumptions.
In the paper
- page 134 of the paper of lax-157538, Transducers
Theorem
Every function computed by an aperiodic bimachine is a first-order relabelling (Theorem C.4.16 of Transducers, the implication from bimachine to relabelling). By Theorem C.4.11 the runs of the two aperiodic automata are described in first-order logic: for each pair of a transition of the prefix automaton and one of the suffix automaton there is a first-order formula selecting the positions at which they are used, and the output map is the output function of the bimachine.
Lean source view on GitHub
| 1 | import Lax132576.Bimachines |
| 2 | import Lax314295.MSORelabellings |
| 3 | |
| 4 | /-! |
| 5 | --- |
| 6 | title: Aperiodic bimachines compute first-order relabellings |
| 7 | type: theorem |
| 8 | --- |
| 9 | Every function computed by an aperiodic bimachine is a first-order |
| 10 | relabelling (Theorem C.4.16 of *Transducers*, the implication from bimachine to |
| 11 | relabelling). By Theorem C.4.11 the runs of the two aperiodic automata are |
| 12 | described in first-order logic: for each pair of a transition of the prefix |
| 13 | automaton and one of the suffix automaton there is a first-order formula |
| 14 | selecting the positions at which they are used, and the output map is the |
| 15 | output function of the bimachine. |
| 16 | |
| 17 | # Formalization notes |
| 18 | |
| 19 | Both alphabets are assumed finite, as in the book. |
| 20 | -/ |
| 21 | |
| 22 | namespace Lax314295.FORelabellingOfAperiodicBimachine |
| 23 | |
| 24 | open Lax132576.Bimachines Lax314295.MSORelabellings |
| 25 | |
| 26 | /-- A function computed by an aperiodic bimachine is a first-order relabelling. -/ |
| 27 | axiom isFORelabelling_of_isAperiodicBimachine {A B : Type} [Finite A] [Finite B] |
| 28 | {f : List A → List B} (hf : IsAperiodicBimachine f) : IsFORelabelling f |
| 29 | |
| 30 | end Lax314295.FORelabellingOfAperiodicBimachine |
| 31 |
Formalization notes
Both alphabets are assumed finite, as in the book.
Community review
Discussion
Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above; your ORCID profile must share a public name.
0 comments