Proof of `The removal rule for a prediction already in the list` (3rd statement)

groundedproofs/Lax303562Proofs/Removal.lean · lax-303562

What this proof establishes

no assumptions

Assuming the claims on the left, the claim on the right holds — checked by the archive's pipeline. Proof code is not displayed here.

Read the Lean proof on GitHub

Description

The remaining denominator D½D − ½ is positive by hypothesis; clearing both gives s(D½)<(spj)Ds · (D − ½) < (s − p j) · D, i.e. pj<s/(2D)p j < s / (2D).