Proof of `The inclusion rule for a candidate prediction` (1st statement)

groundedproofs/Lax303562Proofs/Candidate.lean · lax-303562

What this proof establishes

no assumptions

Assuming the claims on the left, the claim on the right holds — checked by the archive's pipeline. Proof code is not displayed here.

Read the Lean proof on GitHub

Description

Both denominators are positive; clearing them gives s(D+½)<(s+pj)Ds · (D + ½) < (s + p j) · D, i.e. s/(2D)<pjs / (2D) < p j.