A small conditioning set gives low edge cost
Lax263307.ConditioningExistence · concepts/Lax263307/ConditioningExistence.lean · lax-263307
No public endorsements yet.
Loading review…
Sign in with ORCIDNatural Language Statement
Theorem
Let be positive integers with , and let . There exists a set of size at most with such that the conditioned costs lie in , have total mass , and satisfy
Concept map
Evidence
Each proof establishes this claim relative to its assumptions.
Lean source view on GitHub
| 1 | import Lax263307.EntropyDecrease |
| 2 | import Lax263307.EntropyBounds |
| 3 | |
| 4 | /-! |
| 5 | --- |
| 6 | title: A small conditioning set gives low edge cost |
| 7 | type: theorem |
| 8 | --- |
| 9 | Let be positive integers with , and let |
| 10 | . There exists a set of size at most with |
| 11 | such that the conditioned costs lie in , have total mass , and satisfy |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | # Attribution |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Bonnet–Chang, the existence assertion in Lemma 12. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | # Formalization notes |
| 19 | |
| 20 | This statement supplies the mathematical guarantee for finite enumeration. |
| 21 | The rational implementation and its running-time bound are separate proof |
| 22 | obligations. No entropy values need to be computed by the enumeration. |
| 23 | -/ |
| 24 | |
| 25 | namespace Lax263307.ConditioningExistence |
| 26 | |
| 27 | open LinearRelaxation ConditioningDistribution Entropy |
| 28 | |
| 29 | /-- Existence of the conditioning set promised by Lemma 12. -/ |
| 30 | axiom exists_low_edge_cost {n : ℕ} (G : SimpleGraph (Fin n)) [DecidableRel G.Adj] |
| 31 | (k r p : ℕ) (y : MomentVector n r) (feasible : IsFeasible G k r y) |
| 32 | (target_positive : 0 < k) (level_positive : 0 < r) (threshold_positive : 0 < p) |
| 33 | (budget : 2 * (p : ℝ) * Real.logb 2 n ≤ r) : |
| 34 | ∃ A : Finset (Fin n), A.card ≤ r ∧ 0 < value y A ∧ |
| 35 | (∀ v, 0 ≤ conditioned y A v ∧ conditioned y A v ≤ 1) ∧ |
| 36 | (∑ v, conditioned y A v) = k ∧ |
| 37 | edgeCost G (conditioned y A) ≤ (k : ℝ) ^ 2 / p |
| 38 | |
| 39 | end Lax263307.ConditioningExistence |
| 40 |
Attribution
Bonnet–Chang, the existence assertion in Lemma 12.
Formalization notes
This statement supplies the mathematical guarantee for finite enumeration. The rational implementation and its running-time bound are separate proof obligations. No entropy values need to be computed by the enumeration.
From Mathlib
none
Discussion
Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.
0 comments