While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

Lower concentration of the fibers of a uniform random map

Lax253009.RandomFibers · concepts/Lax253009/RandomFibers.lean · lax-253009

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Theorem

    For a uniformly random map from an NN-element set to an MM-element set, with N,M>0N,M>0, the probability that some fiber has fewer than N/(2M)N/(2M) elements is at most Me−N/(8M2)M e^{-N/(8M^2)}.

    This is a sufficient version of the concentration estimate in Lemma 4.3. For N=2wN=2^w and M=2sM=2^s, it tends to zero exponentially in 2w2^w for each fixed ss. The paper uses a sharper Chernoff bound; the threshold for ww in the soundness theorem can absorb the difference.

    Concept map
    4 concepts; 1 descendant hidden
    100%
    Proven claimThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on A
    Evidence

    This concept declares 2 statements. Each proof establishes one of them relative to its assumptions.

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax253009.ExponentialBounds
    2
    3/-!
    4---
    5title: Lower concentration of the fibers of a uniform random map
    6type: theorem
    7---
    8For a uniformly random map from an NN-element set to an MM-element set,
    9with N,M>0N,M>0, the probability that some fiber has fewer than N/(2M)N/(2M)
    10elements is at most Me−N/(8M2)M e^{-N/(8M^2)}.
    11
    12This is a sufficient version of the concentration estimate in Lemma 4.3.
    13For N=2wN=2^w and M=2sM=2^s, it tends to zero exponentially in 2w2^w for each
    14fixed ss. The paper uses a sharper Chernoff bound; the threshold for ww
    15in the soundness theorem can absorb the difference.
    16-/
    17
    18namespace Lax253009.RandomFibers
    19
    20open FiniteProbability
    21
    22def fiber {ι κ : Type} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq κ] (f : ι → κ) (z : κ) : Finset ι :=
    23 Finset.univ.filter fun i ↦ f i = z
    24
    25axiom small_fiber {ι κ : Type} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
    26 [Fintype κ] [DecidableEq κ] [Nonempty κ] (hN : 0 < Fintype.card ι) (z : κ) :
    27 probability (fun f : ι → κ ↦ (fiber f z).card <
    28 (Fintype.card ι : ℝ) / (2 * Fintype.card κ)) ≤
    29 Real.exp (-(Fintype.card ι : ℝ) / (8 * (Fintype.card κ : ℝ) ^ 2))
    30
    31axiom any_small_fiber {ι κ : Type} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
    32 [Fintype κ] [DecidableEq κ] [Nonempty κ] (hN : 0 < Fintype.card ι) :
    33 probability (fun f : ι → κ ↦ ∃ z, (fiber f z).card <
    34 (Fintype.card ι : ℝ) / (2 * Fintype.card κ)) ≤
    35 (Fintype.card κ : ℝ) *
    36 Real.exp (-(Fintype.card ι : ℝ) / (8 * (Fintype.card κ : ℝ) ^ 2))
    37
    38end Lax253009.RandomFibers
    39
    Show ProofShow Proof

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…