Success probability of the construction program
Lax235315.ConstructionProbability · concepts/Lax235315/ConstructionProbability.lean · lax-235315
No public endorsements yet.
Loading review…
Sign in with ORCIDNatural Language Statement
Theorem
For all sufficiently large resource constants K, at least two thirds of the equally likely finite random tapes cause an admissible construction run to reach the final halt with the success flag set.
Concept map
Evidence
Each proof establishes this claim relative to its assumptions.
No proof in the archive yet — this claim is open.
Lean source view on GitHub
| 1 | import Lax235315.ConstructionContracts |
| 2 | |
| 3 | /-! |
| 4 | --- |
| 5 | title: Success probability of the construction program |
| 6 | type: theorem |
| 7 | --- |
| 8 | For all sufficiently large resource constants K, at least two thirds of the |
| 9 | equally likely finite random tapes cause an admissible construction run to |
| 10 | reach the final halt with the success flag set. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | # Formalization notes |
| 13 | |
| 14 | This is an open probability obligation for the explicit program, not for an |
| 15 | ideal uniform-sampling oracle. Its proof must account for collisions of the |
| 16 | finite random keys, conditional sampling at every adaptive round, and the |
| 17 | available tape length. Output quality is proved separately. |
| 18 | -/ |
| 19 | |
| 20 | namespace Lax235315.ConstructionProbability |
| 21 | open Lax235315.ConstructionContracts |
| 22 | |
| 23 | /-- At least two thirds of the finite tapes lead to successful termination. -/ |
| 24 | axiom eventually_hasSuccessProbability : |
| 25 | ∃ K₀ : ℕ, 1 ≤ K₀ ∧ ∀ K : ℕ, K₀ ≤ K → HasSuccessProbability K |
| 26 | |
| 27 | end Lax235315.ConstructionProbability |
| 28 |
Formalization notes
This is an open probability obligation for the explicit program, not for an ideal uniform-sampling oracle. Its proof must account for collisions of the finite random keys, conditional sampling at every adaptive round, and the available tape length. Output quality is proved separately.
Discussion
Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.
0 comments