Lax194892.PebbleIffFor
Pebble transducers and for-transducers compute the same functions
concepts/Lax194892/PebbleIffFor.lean · lax-194892
No public endorsements yet.
Loading review…
Sign in with ORCIDConcept map
Evidence
Each proof establishes this claim relative to its assumptions.
In the paper
- page 168 of the paper of lax-157538, Transducers
Theorem
Pebble transducers and for-transducers compute the same string-to-string functions (Theorem D.2.4 of Transducers). The two implications are the separate statements and ; this statement is their conjunction.
Lean source view on GitHub
| 1 | import Lax194892.PebbleTransducers |
| 2 | import Lax194892.ForTransducers |
| 3 | |
| 4 | /-! |
| 5 | --- |
| 6 | title: Pebble transducers and for-transducers compute the same functions |
| 7 | type: theorem |
| 8 | --- |
| 9 | Pebble transducers and for-transducers compute the same string-to-string |
| 10 | functions (Theorem D.2.4 of *Transducers*). The two implications are the |
| 11 | separate statements `ForOfPebble` and `PebbleOfFor`; this statement is their |
| 12 | conjunction. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | # Formalization notes |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Both alphabets are assumed finite. |
| 17 | -/ |
| 18 | |
| 19 | namespace Lax194892.PebbleIffFor |
| 20 | |
| 21 | open Lax194892.PebbleTransducers Lax194892.ForTransducers |
| 22 | |
| 23 | /-- A function is computed by a pebble transducer if and only if it is computed by |
| 24 | a for-transducer. -/ |
| 25 | axiom isPebbleTransducer_iff_isForTransducer {A B : Type} [Finite A] [Finite B] |
| 26 | (f : List A → List B) : IsPebbleTransducer f ↔ IsForTransducer f |
| 27 | |
| 28 | end Lax194892.PebbleIffFor |
| 29 |
Formalization notes
Both alphabets are assumed finite.
Community review
Discussion
Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above; your ORCID profile must share a public name.
0 comments