Draft — mutable and not usable as a dependency; its citation marks the draft state.

Lax194892.PebbleIffFor

Pebble transducers and for-transducers compute the same functions

concepts/Lax194892/PebbleIffFor.lean · lax-194892

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Concept map

    Proven claimDefinitionThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on A

    Evidence

    Each proof establishes this claim relative to its assumptions.

    In the paper

    Theorem

    Pebble transducers and for-transducers compute the same string-to-string functions (Theorem D.2.4 of Transducers). The two implications are the separate statements ForOfPebbleForOfPebble and PebbleOfForPebbleOfFor; this statement is their conjunction.

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax194892.PebbleTransducers
    2import Lax194892.ForTransducers
    3
    4/-!
    5---
    6title: Pebble transducers and for-transducers compute the same functions
    7type: theorem
    8---
    9Pebble transducers and for-transducers compute the same string-to-string
    10functions (Theorem D.2.4 of *Transducers*). The two implications are the
    11separate statements `ForOfPebble` and `PebbleOfFor`; this statement is their
    12conjunction.
    13
    14# Formalization notes
    15
    16Both alphabets are assumed finite.
    17-/
    18
    19namespace Lax194892.PebbleIffFor
    20
    21open Lax194892.PebbleTransducers Lax194892.ForTransducers
    22
    23/-- A function is computed by a pebble transducer if and only if it is computed by
    24a for-transducer. -/
    25axiom isPebbleTransducer_iff_isForTransducer {A B : Type} [Finite A] [Finite B]
    26 (f : List A → List B) : IsPebbleTransducer f ↔ IsForTransducer f
    27
    28end Lax194892.PebbleIffFor
    29
    Show Proof

    Formalization notes

    Both alphabets are assumed finite.

    Used by

    none

    From Mathlib

    none

    Community review

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above; your ORCID profile must share a public name.

    0 comments

    Loading discussion…