First-order reductions are strictly weaker than logarithmic-space reductions
Lax945089.ReductionsBelowLogSpace · concepts/Lax945089/ReductionsBelowLogSpace.lean · lax-945089
No public endorsements yet.
Loading review…
Sign in with ORCIDNatural Language Statement
Theorem
There is a problem to which EVEN reduces by an FO(DTC) reduction but by no ordered first-order reduction. The first-order reductions under which the complete problems of these submissions are complete are therefore strictly weaker than deterministic logarithmic-space reductions, in their logical form.
Concept map
Evidence
Each proof establishes this claim relative to its assumptions.
Lean source view on GitHub
Show Proof
Builds on
Lax134656.PartialFixedPointLax485149.ClassLLax485149.ClassNLLax485149.DeterministicTransitiveClosureLax485149.FirstOrderDefinabilityLax485149.ProblemsLax485149.TransitiveClosureLax535992.ClassPTIMELax535992.InflationaryFixedPointLax895169.ArithmeticLogicLax904597.ClassesLax904597.InterpretationsLax904597.ProblemsLax904597.RelativizedLax904597.SecondOrderLax945089.EhrenfeuchtGamesLax945089.EvenLax945089.OrderFreeFirstOrderLax945089.ParityLax945089.PebbleGamesLax945089.TransitiveClosureReductions
Used by
none
Discussion
Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.
0 comments