EVEN is not first-order definable, even with an order
Lax945089.EvenNotFirstOrder · concepts/Lax945089/EvenNotFirstOrder.lean · lax-945089
No public endorsements yet.
Loading review…
Sign in with ORCIDNatural Language Statement
Theorem
EVEN is not order-free first-order definable, bare sets of different parities being equivalent for any number of rounds once they are large enough; and it is not FO() definable either, by Ehrenfeucht's theorem on linear orders. An order-free definition is in particular an ordered one.
Concept map
Evidence
Lean source view on GitHub
Show ProofShow ProofShow Proof
Builds on
Lax134656.PartialFixedPointLax485149.ClassLLax485149.ClassNLLax485149.DeterministicTransitiveClosureLax485149.FirstOrderDefinabilityLax485149.ProblemsLax485149.TransitiveClosureLax535992.ClassPTIMELax535992.InflationaryFixedPointLax895169.ArithmeticLogicLax904597.ClassesLax904597.InterpretationsLax904597.ProblemsLax904597.RelativizedLax904597.SecondOrderLax945089.EhrenfeuchtGamesLax945089.EvenLax945089.OrderFreeFirstOrderLax945089.ParityLax945089.PebbleGamesLax945089.TransitiveClosureReductions
Used by
none
Discussion
Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.
0 comments