While this submission is a draft, it cannot be used by other submissions.

Incomparability is symmetric and irreflexive

Lax825442.IncomparableProperties · concepts/Lax825442/IncomparableProperties.lean · lax-825442

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Theorem

    Incomparability of graph parameters is symmetric: exchanging the parameters exchanges its two nonbounds. It is also irreflexive, since every parameter bounds itself using the identity function.

    Concept map
    5 concepts
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on A
    Evidence

    Each proof establishes this claim relative to its assumptions.

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax825442.Incomparable
    2
    3/-!
    4---
    5title: Incomparability is symmetric and irreflexive
    6type: theorem
    7---
    8Incomparability of graph parameters is symmetric: exchanging the parameters
    9exchanges its two nonbounds. It is also irreflexive, since every parameter
    10bounds itself using the identity function.
    11-/
    12
    13namespace Lax825442.IncomparableProperties
    14
    15open Lax153141.GraphParameters
    16
    17/-- Incomparability is symmetric and no parameter is incomparable with itself. -/
    18axiom incomparable_symmetric_irreflexive :
    19 (Symmetric Lax825442.Incomparable.Incomparable) ∧
    20 (Irreflexive Lax825442.Incomparable.Incomparable)
    21
    22end Lax825442.IncomparableProperties
    23
    Show Proof
    Builds on
    Used by

    none

    From Mathlib

    none

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…