Proof of `Myhill–Nerode for Mealy machines`
What this proof establishes
no assumptions
Assuming the claims on the left, the claim on the right holds — checked by the archive's pipeline. Proof code is not displayed here.
In the paper
- page 29 of the paper of lax-157538, Transducers
Description
The Myhill–Nerode lemma for Mealy machines (Lemma A.2.10). From a machine, the derivative after is the run from the state reached after ; conversely the source builds the minimal machine on the finitely many derivatives, its transition from on outputting the first letter of and moving to .
Attribution
Lemma A.2.10 of Transducers; Lean proof by Aristotle ().