Membership in RE depends only on the finite instances

Lax624099.REFinite · concepts/Lax624099/REFinite.lean · lax-624099

proven

Loading review…

Sign in with ORCID

Community review

Flags

Each flag is tied to a public ORCID identity and explains why this concept may be incorrect.

No flags have been submitted.

    Community review

    Flag this concept

    State precisely what appears incorrect. This explanation will be public under your ORCID name.

    No source line selected.

    Natural Language Statement

    Theorem

    Two problems that agree on every finite structure are both in RE or neither.

    Concept map
    15 concepts
    100%
    Proven claimDefinitionThis conceptRelated conceptA → B: B builds on A
    Evidence

    Each proof establishes this claim relative to its assumptions.

    Lean source view on GitHub

    1import Lax904597.Problems
    2import Lax904597.Interpretations
    3import Lax904597.Relativized
    4import Lax904597.Classes
    5import Lax624099.Problems
    6import Lax624099.ValueInvention
    7import Lax624099.ClassRE
    8import Lax624099.FiniteSatisfiability
    9import Lax624099.Halting
    10import Lax624099.CodeHalting
    11import Lax624099.PostCorrespondence
    12import Lax624099.ConcreteInstances
    13import Lax904597.Machines
    14
    15/-!
    16---
    17title: Membership in RE depends only on the finite instances
    18type: theorem
    19---
    20Two problems that agree on every finite structure are both in RE or neither.
    21-/
    22
    23namespace Lax624099.REFinite
    24
    25open FirstOrder FirstOrder.Language
    26open Lax904597.Problems Lax904597.Interpretations Lax904597.Relativized Lax904597.Classes
    27open Lax904597.Machines Lax624099.Problems Lax624099.ValueInvention Lax624099.ClassRE
    28open Lax624099.FiniteSatisfiability
    29open Lax624099.Halting Lax624099.CodeHalting Lax624099.PostCorrespondence
    30open Lax624099.ConcreteInstances
    31
    32/-- Membership in RE depends only on the finite instances of a problem. -/
    33axiom RE_mem_congr_finite : ∀ {L : Language.{0, 0}} [L.IsRelational] {P Q : DecisionProblem L},
    34 (∀ (A : Type) [L.Structure A] [Finite A], P A ↔ Q A) → (RE.Mem P ↔ RE.Mem Q)
    35
    36end Lax624099.REFinite
    37
    Show Proof

    Discussion

    Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above.

    Loading discussion…