Proof of `Hadamard automata and Hadamard-finite series` (3rd statement)
What this proof establishes
no assumptions
Assuming the claims on the left, the claim on the right holds — checked by the archive's pipeline. Proof code is not displayed here.
Description
The Hadamard coincidence theorem (paper §5): a series is Hadamard-finite if and only if it is Hadamard-recognisable. The "recognisable implies finite" direction reads off the generator tuple ; the "finite implies recognisable" direction extends the witnessing tuple by the series itself and builds the automaton from the closure under left derivatives.