Proof of `Checking the output of a configuration graph against a regular language`
What this proof establishes
no assumptions
Assuming the claims on the left, the claim on the right holds — checked by the archive's pipeline. Proof code is not displayed here.
In the paper
- page 95 of the paper of lax-157538, Transducers
Description
The representations whose output lies in a regular language form a regular language (Lemma C.2.4), .
Proof strategy
The concept's language is the inverse image of the source's under the letter-to-letter bijection (, of the bridge), and inverse images under letter-to-letter maps preserve regularity (, the source's ).
Attribution
Lemma C.2.4 of Transducers, Part C; formalised by Aristotle (Harmonic), , .