Proof of `The sum of two regular functions on disjoint alphabets`
What this proof establishes
no assumptions
Assuming the claims on the left, the claim on the right holds — checked by the archive's pipeline. Proof code is not displayed here.
In the paper
- page 99 of the paper of lax-157538, Transducers
Description
The sum of two regular functions on disjoint alphabets is regular (Claim C.2.11, corrected on the empty input), .
Proof strategy
The source's (, , ) builds the sum prime by prime; the claim as printed is refuted on the empty input by , hence the two clauses on nonempty inputs only.
Attribution
Claim C.2.11 of Transducers, Part C; formalised by Aristotle (Harmonic).