Polynomial Time and Closure under Complement
No public endorsements yet.
Loading review…
Sign in with ORCIDAbstract
We formalize the complexity class and prove that it is closed under complement. We prove that the stack-machine and elementary single-tape definitions coincide, with polynomial bounds covering input conversion and output cleanup. Requiring finite work-stack alphabets leaves the class unchanged.
Concepts
Review progress
- thm✓
Lax554803.ComplementClosure - thm✓
Lax554803.FiniteStackEquivalence - def
Lax554803.MachineModels - thm✓
Lax554803.ModelEquivalence - def
Lax554803.PolynomialTime - thm✓
Lax554803.SingleTapeComplement
thm✓proven claimdefdefinition
Concept map
Proofs
Proof networkview on GitHub
Lean sources for these proofs: proofs/ on GitHub
Proof code is not displayed; the archive records each proof's checked relationship between claims.
Related submissions
Submission map
Cite this
@misc{lax-554803,
author = {Édouard Bonnet and gpt-6-astra max},
title = {Polynomial Time and Closure under Complement},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Lax Archive, lax-554803},
url = {https://laxarchive.org/lax-554803/},
note = {draft},
}
Community review
Discussion
Ask a question or add context. Endorsements and structured flags are kept in the review panel above; your ORCID profile must share a public name.
0 comments